The Wicked Witch is Dead! I knew I had to say that line at some point. Trump is melting. Maybe Martin Luther King, Jr., was right: "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."
***
The Wicked Witch is Dead! I knew I had to say that line at some point. Trump is melting. Maybe Martin Luther King, Jr., was right: "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."
***
It seems almost a settled fact in psychology that when you are depressed, your thoughts will generally be negative. And when you are not depressed your thoughts will generally be more upbeat and positive. This is a good thing for people who struggle with depression to remember.
I say that because when we are depressed and find almost all of our thoughts are negative we tend to think our thoughts are always like this. They aren't.
It's hard to remember this when depressed. Yet, whatever headway we can make with remembering this will only garner good.
***
I was reading recently about the upcoming execution of Lisa Montgomery. She would be the first scheduled federal execution of a woman in nearly 70 years. The Trump administration wants the execution to go forward.
Why I argue--and many others--against it is because of the traumatic early background of Ms. Montgomery. She was sexually abused by her father, physically abused by her mother, and was pushed into child prostitution by both parents.
She has since struggled with PTSD, dissociation, and possible psychosis.
There's more to the story that I'll write about in another post.
***
I've noticed--and most people would probably agree--that most people don't listen well. I wonder it things were different in American one or two generations back. I think so. I sense people took their time a bit more and were more reflective. But not much more than now.
In other words, it is rare to come across someone who really listens. When you do, since it is so rare, it is almost eerie.
***
I have been reading much more material as of late on depression. It's a topic that I find fascinating, in part, because I have experienced it and because it's so common and mental health professionals say it is highly treatable. I do believe there is more evidence-based techniques than ever, yet there is so much information out there that is not evidence-based, people who are depressed see a smorgasbord of options and tend to see them all as equal.
But it's not so. One belief is that psychotropic medication is one of the best ways to alleviate depression, yet, it isn't. It does help mitigate depression but its success rate is not that great.
I'll ramble on this topic more in the future.
***
I have been reading more on psychology since the presidential election is over. I do feel more at peace. And therefore it feels good to be reading more in my field rather than skittishly reviewing the national news to see what bizarre--and harmful--things have been done by President Trump.
I have been reading specifically on clinical depression and plan to try to get some articles published. Better days appear to be here, at least for a while.
***
I know Trump supporters are angry, probably more angry than most Biden supporters realize. And I know there are various reasons people supported Trump--some because he will put conservative justices on the Supreme Court, some because of his racial and ethnic views, some because of his stance on immigration.
One thing, though, those people don't realize, or play down in their own minds, is that Trump had the makings of a dictator. Democracy was in peril.
***
Donald J. Trump is no longer president of the United States. Joe Biden is.
What more is there to say?
***
Tomorrow is Election Day. I guess it's said every presidential election that this is "the big one." In other words, that whatever presidential election it is, many people see it as the most important. Yet, it is hard to argue that tomorrow's election is not at least one of significant.
I do think Joe Biden will be our next president. But, last election I was positive--as were a number of political writers--that Donald Trump would not be the president.
What almost all can agree on is that tomorrow is a fraught election. Though, hopefully, it is one where the leader is reasonably honest and competent. We do need that.
***
In the news recently I read that almost 550 children had still not been reunited with their parents when the families were separated at the border a few years ago. And even more shocking to me is that the Trump administration, years after the separation, wanted to wash their hands Pilate-style and not worry about identifying and reaching out to families it separated before June 2018.
I sense, to some degree, this will play a part in bringing down Trump. I think even some of his supporters will read about this and see it for what it was--an attempt on the part of Trump to make some of his base happy and to do it at any cost. Even the cost of damaging the lives of innocent children.
Sad.
***
I have been reading the book I mentioned in the last post, Dark Money. The book is exceedingly well-researched and is written in a conversational style. What amazes me from reading the book is how much goes on behind the scenes, and by "behind the scenes" I mean how much news doesn't get in the spotlight.
Also I'm amazed by how much those with lots of money can do besides doing their day-to-day job. For instance, Charles Koch is written about extensively in the book and he seems to always be opening some non-profit, giving away large sums of money, or traveling the world lecturing while being a CEO of one of the most profitable businesses in the world. Yet, I think it's closer to the truth to say the former things are his job. His primary job, it seems, is making money. Being a CEO comes second to these more profitable endeavors.
***
I have been reading the excellent book by Jane Mayer of The New Yorker. It's called Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. This is an area I've read about before, but the depth on the topic in this book is truly amazing, and what I find more amazing is just how beautifully the book flows. It's probably not always easy to make certain parts of this story interesting, but she sure does.
What I have learned is the phenomenal part the Koch brothers have played in making politics more about big money than anything else. So many people say that there is too much money in politics, yet few realize what--and who--is at the root of the problem.
***
Recently it was announced that the president has the coronavirus. This is truly a case of pride coming before a fall, or the equivalent notion, of hubris bringing on a downfall, as is talked about at length in Greek mythology.
It will be interesting to see how Trump's most committed followers react to the news. Right now there is just silence, and some crickets.
I have a feeling it will be like what is talked about in the book When Prophecy Fails. That is, his most fervent followers will become even more fervent, because they will, somehow, see the president's coronavirus as just part of Trump's part in bringing about God's kingdom.
***
I wrote a post in April about a book I was dipping into, called The Cult of Trump by Steven Hassan. I didn't finish it then but I plan to in the near future.
I think it is one of the best books out there explaining the Trump phenomenon. Another book that might be a rival would be How Democracies Die by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt.
Both books give great insight into Trump. What Winston Churchill once said about Russia (a paraphrase) can be said of the mystery of Trump: it is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.
Thankfully there are some people who like riddles, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.
***
I just read the well-known memo written by Lewis Powell in 1971, where he excoriated the business community for not fighting back harder against leftists and liberals who he saw as tearing at the fabric of business, free enterprise, and the entire American system.
I must say, though, Powell comes off as more open-minded than most conservatives nowadays. He is at least willing to have a liberal viewpoint in the public square, yet, he does appear dogmatic when it comes to certain bromides of big business.
I'm glad I read the letter. But I must say, I do find it hard to imagine the letter was the source of the groundswell of conservative energy in the 70s or early 80s. Nonetheless, the business community surely began to fight back and is now one of the most powerful lobbying groups in America.
***
I just read an excellent op-ed in the Los Angeles Times. It was titled, "With global warming, expect inferno seasons in the American West," and it was dated September 12th, 2020.
It does a great job of presenting clearly and simply what is involved in climate change. Some lines that stands out:
--"More than 3.1 million acres have burned in California this year--some 3% of the state--with many wildfires still at zero containment and months of fire season left to go. This far exceeds the previous record set in 2018, when 1.7 million acres burned, including the town of Paradise."
--"The planet is currently 1.0 C to 1.2 C (about 2 F) hotter than it ought to be. This excess heat is entirely due to humans, mainly from burning fossil fuels and destroying forests. These activities release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which blocks some of the infrared heat photons that otherwise would radiate away into space."
I recommend the article.
***
I have been reading Dr. Robert Reich's latest book, The System: Who Rigged It, How to Fix It. It is an excellent book that looks at how the American middle class got to be shafted by the 1%. The logic and cogentness of the book is impeccable.
I hope to write some articles based on material I've gotten from the book.
Also, I have found out a lot of information that I did not know. For instance, Dr. Reich goes into detail talking about the individual, Sandy Weill, who played a major part in the ending of the Glass-Steagall Act, which put a partition between what banks traditionally have done (i.e., lending), and what they have come to do (i.e., be involved in risky investments).
Indeed, many parts of the book, to me, have been a revelation.
***
I just read an interesting blog post on Carl Jung responding to a woman asking how to get over being depressed. In the post Jung tells the woman that getting over depression takes a few key tasks--being useful, living in the moment, and dealing with one's shadow.
I've been ruthless in condensing Jung's poetic letter to this lady, but it did make think about what I would say are the primary things to do--or not do--to "beat" depression. In the next few posts I'll ponder this question. It's a rich, worthwhile question that seems to be given little thought in our society.
***
I've been giving some thought to the question, How much of what people say is praise and love for God is really fear? That is, could it be when some people are saying how great God is and how much we should worship God, they are really saying these things out of fear, fear that God, when they are dying, will reject them and send them to eternal punishment?
I had thought about it briefly in the past, but it seemed almost impossible to get to the truth of the matter, because people use self-defense mechanisms (e.g., projection, displacement, reaction formation). But I thing there is one relatively good method of telling: how demanding is the person in making sure you will agree with their view of God.
***
I just read about a recent study that again marked the importance of social connection as the strongest protective factor for depression. The study was in The American Journal of Psychiatry. It does seem that more and more studies affirm this.
Though, going by my own experience and my take on the average person, many people read about and "hear" these studies, but few respond in a visceral manner. By "visceral manner," I mean, few of us realize that the information can be put to good use in our own lives. Using myself as an example, I have heard numerous times how social connection mitigates depression. And it seems like it has been a slow realization for me that "it may be true."
Maybe when we see information we're not ready to take in, we put it in a category called, "Interesting, I'll Have to Keep That in Mind." Which is another way of saying, "Not yet."
It seems as of late I've become fascinated/obsessed with learning more about wealth inequality in the United States. It's a topic that I always see somewhere in the news (though rarely at "the top" of the news), yet, it seems, the average person on the street rarely talks about it.
I remember speaking years ago to a neighbor about this topic. Somehow we were talking about people who have much wealth and he said something like, "Well, you know, we just have to give the rich people their money so society can work smoothly." I think I half-heartedly agreed because I didn't know how to respond.
As I thought about his statement one question kept coming up--Why? I think it is tied to the notion of "trickle-down economics." The idea of trickle-down economics may sound good in theory but there is no evidence that "it works."
I will talk more about this topic in future posts. I really have to, so as to make sense of it.
***